Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA NVS 810

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA NVS 810

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 68W)
NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1033MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
NVS 810 +639%
1.058 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2015
Radeon R600
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
902 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
68W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GM107
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy