Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA PG506 242

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
3464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +7116%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
Radeon R600
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
120
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GA100
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy