Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 8670 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 8670 OEM +463%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2013
Radeon R600
Generation
Sea Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Oland
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy