CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM
VS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 8670 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
264 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 8670 OEM
+463%
0.806 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
VS
Radeon HD 8670 OEM
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2013
Radeon R600
Generation
Sea Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
3
Compute Units
6
120
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Oland
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Board Design
35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD FirePro R5000
2
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
3
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
4
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon RX 7600
5
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100
6
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2
7
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD FirePro D700
8
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
9
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD FireStream 9250
10
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy