Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +2403%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Navi 24
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy