Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM +565%
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Dec 2013
Radeon R600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Cape Verde
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy