Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
1288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 +3139%
4.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2020
Radeon R600
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1408
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Navi 14
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy