Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
264 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
T400 4 GB +665%
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2021
Radeon R600
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
120
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
TU117
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy