ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 43W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.28GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
+30%
0.188 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Feb 2010
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
120
Shading Units
72
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
43W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GT215
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
