Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX 10 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 10 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 170HX 10 GB and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 10 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1560GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX 10 GB +2547%
12.63 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Jun 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
5120bit
Memory Bus
448bit
1560GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
70
SM Count
24
4480
Shading Units
192
280
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
28
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
10 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GT200
GA100-105A-A1
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy