NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 170HX 8 GB and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.49TB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3680 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX 8 GB
+1163%
12.63 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jun 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.49TB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
800
280
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
RV770
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.1
