NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 170HX 8 GB and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1280GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.49TB/s vs 152.0GB/s)
4032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 's Advantages
Lower TDP (210W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX 8 GB
+862%
12.63 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
1.312 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Nov 2011
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1280MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
320bit
1.49TB/s
Bandwidth
152.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
70
SM Count
14
4480
Shading Units
448
280
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
40
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.50 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.99 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1312 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
164.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
210W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GF110
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-270-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
