NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs Intel Arc A380
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 6GB VRAM Arc A380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (2050MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+200%
12.63 TFLOPS
Arc A380
4.198 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jun 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
96bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
1024
280
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.397 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.198 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1050 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
DG2-128
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
