NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs Intel Arc A750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (2400MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
12.63 TFLOPS
Arc A750
+36%
17.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Oct 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
2050 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
3584
280
TMUs
224
128
ROPs
112
280
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
DG2-512
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
