NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (2000MHz vs 1650MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 185W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
+147%
7.603 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
768
144
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
24
288
Tensor Cores
96
36
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
185W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
DG2-128
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
