Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD FirePro W4000

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +500%
7.603 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Aug 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
768
144
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

185W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Pitcairn
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy