NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1650MHz
Lower TDP (185W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+223%
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
8192
144
TMUs
512
64
ROPs
512
288
Tensor Cores
128
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
185W
TDP
450W
450 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
22 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
