Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
1584 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 5750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (86W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +654%
7.603 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5750
1.008 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Oct 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
9
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
720
144
TMUs
36
64
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1008 GFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

185W
TDP
86W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Juniper
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Juniper LE (215-0754009)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy