Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (185W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +32%
7.603 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Apr 2017
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
2304
144
TMUs
144
64
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

185W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Ellesmere
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy