Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1545MHz
Lower TDP (250W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 10GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 560.0GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 50HX
11.07 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +122%
24.58 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
384bit
560.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
8192
192
TMUs
512
80
ROPs
512
448
Tensor Cores
128
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
5 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

123.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
22.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
11.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
346.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
450W
600 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
TU102-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
22 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net