Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 90HX vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

NVIDIA CMP 90HX vs Moore Threads MTT S2000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 90HX and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 90HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1710MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (760.3GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 10GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 320W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 90HX +105%
21.89 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1188 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
760.3GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
50
SM Count
-
6400
Shading Units
4096
200
TMUs
256
80
ROPs
256
200
Tensor Cores
-
50
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
5 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

136.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
342.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
21.89 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
21.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
342.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

320W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
GA102-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
628 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net