Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+2365%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
1024
Shading Units
72
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.488 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.46 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
162.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GT215
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM4
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
