Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+846%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G92
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
