Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +1088%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.504 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
14.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
41W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GK107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy