Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1950MHz vs 1645MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000
+216%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Oct 2016
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5X
96bit
Memory Bus
384bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
1024
Shading Units
3840
64
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GP102
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
