Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
4024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +10264%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
9
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
72
256
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.488 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.46 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
162.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GT215
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM4
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy