Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +931%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro K4100M
1.627 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
1152
256
TMUs
96
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.94 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.78 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.627 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.78 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GK104
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N15E-Q3-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy