CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
VS
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
NVIDIA Tesla M2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+1533%
16.79 TFLOPS
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
VS
Tesla M2075
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
448
256
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GF110
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GF110-876-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
2
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
3
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla K10
4
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
5
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
6
NVIDIA L4 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
7
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350
8
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
9
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
10
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Related News
1
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
2
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
3
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
4
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
5
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
6
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
7
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
8
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
9
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
10
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy