Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
7056 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1100 +7835%
22.22 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
7168
Shading Units
112
448
TMUs
56
0
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
204 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
694.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
22.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.22 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
22.22 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
78W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net