Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
6976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+4709%
22.22 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Nov 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
7168
Shading Units
192
448
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
24
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
204 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
694.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
22.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.22 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
22.22 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
100 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
