Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1100 +2931%
22.22 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Mar 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
7168
Shading Units
384
448
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
204 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
694.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
22.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.22 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
22.22 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
51W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
100 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy