Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
6592 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+2850%
22.22 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
7168
Shading Units
576
448
TMUs
48
0
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
204 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
694.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
22.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.22 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
22.22 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
100 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
