Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1100 +933%
22.22 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Aug 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
7168
Shading Units
1024
448
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
204 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
694.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
22.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.22 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
22.22 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
100 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy