Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
7136 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+29927%
22.22 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
7168
Shading Units
32
448
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
204 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
694.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
22.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.22 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
22.22 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
20W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
