Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
13952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1350 +7669%
44.44 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

96GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
2458GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
14336
Shading Units
384
896
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
896
Tensor Cores
-
112
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
408 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
1389 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
44.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
44.44 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
55W
850 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
100 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy