Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 101% (1550MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (96GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
12032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1350 +1150%
44.44 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jul 2014
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

750 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

96GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
2458GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
14336
Shading Units
2304
896
TMUs
192
0
ROPs
48
896
Tensor Cores
-
112
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
1389 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
44.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
44.44 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
150W
850 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
100 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net