Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
8192 additional rendering cores
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (500W vs 600W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1550 +255%
52.43 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Data Center GPU
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
16384
Shading Units
8192
1024
TMUs
256
0
ROPs
128
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

600W
TDP
500W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
10 nm
100 billion
Transistors
8 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy