Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
16368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 600W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1550
+180693%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Oct 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
16384
Shading Units
16
1024
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
4
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
600W
TDP
21W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
G86
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
