Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
15872 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 600W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1550 +3836%
52.43 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jul 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
16384
Shading Units
512
1024
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
48
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

600W
TDP
250W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
100 billion
Transistors
3 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy