Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
16144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (600W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1550
+8329%
52.43 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
16384
Shading Units
240
1024
TMUs
80
0
ROPs
32
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
600W
TDP
800W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
100 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
