Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
16048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 2400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +8117%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000M
0.638 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Feb 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
7
16384
Shading Units
336
1024
TMUs
56
0
ROPs
32
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.650 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.60 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
638.4 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

2400W
TDP
100W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q3-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
100 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy