Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
16352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 2400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +88764%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Sep 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
16384
Shading Units
32
1024
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

2400W
TDP
42W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy