Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
15616 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 2400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +4114%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Mar 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1404 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
192bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
134.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
16384
Shading Units
768
1024
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
24
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
408 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.96 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

2400W
TDP
80W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GK106
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
100 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy