Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 230.9GB/s)
13824 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1747MHz vs 1600MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+486%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Mobile
8.945 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Feb 2018
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1557 MHz
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
16384
Shading Units
2560
1024
TMUs
160
0
ROPs
64
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
100W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
16 nm
100 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
