Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1600MHz vs 1350MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
15488 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+2067%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Max Q
2.419 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
May 2019
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
765 MHz
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
16384
Shading Units
896
1024
TMUs
56
0
ROPs
32
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.20 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
75.60 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.838 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.419 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
50W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
100 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
