Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +2264%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2012
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy