Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD FirePro W8000

ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +2140%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy