Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 510 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 14.37GB/s)
72 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 73W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600 +44%
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce 510 OEM
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Sep 2011
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
898 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.37GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
120
Shading Units
48
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GF119
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy