Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +9288%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
120
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
AD107
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy