Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 225W)
AMD Radeon Pro V520 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V520 +5020%
7.373 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Dec 2020
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.4 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.75 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.373 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
460.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Navi 12
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Navi 12
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
Unknown
153 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy