Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 73W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300 +2075%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Navi 24
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy